ClosedSuppliesEuropeanOnderhandeling zonder bekendmaking

Ex ante Ti-sa Laser

Universiteit Twente · Onderhandeling zonder bekendmaking · 1 lots · 342723
Type
Supplies
38636100
Estimated value
Not published
To deadline
Ongoing
Knock-outs
n/a
exclusion grounds
Award basis
Best price-quality ratio
Assess manuallyconfidence low

The University Twente (UT) intends to order a replacement for its Micra TI:Sa femtosecond laser. Analysis shows that, according to the UT, there is no other Dutch supplier capable of delivering a laser that is compatible with the existing Coherent amplifier. Based on Article 2.32 paragraph 1 sub b bullet 2 Aw 2012, the contract is awarded directly to Cohorent Europe B.V. because there is no competition and no reasonable alternative or substitute exists. The procedure is a negotiated procedure without publication. The UT emphasizes that the technical requirements – a femtosecond laser that integrates seamlessly with the Coherent amplifier – cannot be met by other providers. Therefore, the procurement focuses on a highly specialized, technically unique solution, justifying the choice of Cohorent Europe B.V.

Supplies · Onderhandeling zonder bekendmaking · European procedure

European
Contracting authority
Contract type
Supplies
Onderhandeling zonder bekendmaking
Estimated value
Estimate not published
Submission deadline
Ongoing
Scope
European
European procedure
Lots
1
1 lots
Main CPV code
Location
Netherlands
CharacteristicsCPV 38SuppliesEU tenderfemtosecond laserMicra TI:SaCoherent amplifier

01What is being requested

The University Twente (UT) intends to order a replacement for its Micra TI:Sa femtosecond laser. Analysis shows that, according to the UT, there is no other Dutch supplier capable of delivering a laser that is compatible with the existing Coherent amplifier. Based on Article 2.32 paragraph 1 sub b bullet 2 Aw 2012, the contract is awarded directly to Cohorent Europe B.V. because there is no competition and no reasonable alternative or substitute exists. The procedure is a negotiated procedure without publication. The UT emphasizes that the technical requirements – a femtosecond laser that integrates seamlessly with the Coherent amplifier – cannot be met by other providers. Therefore, the procurement focuses on a highly specialized, technically unique solution, justifying the choice of Cohorent Europe B.V.

UT maintains the position that the contract can be awarded directly to Cohorent Europe B.V. due to the absence of competition for technical reasons within the meaning of Article 2.32 paragraph 1 sub b bullet 2 Aw 2012. Furthermore, according to the UT, there is no reasonable alternative or substitute within the meaning of Article 2.32 paragraph 3 Aw 2012 that can meet the UT's reasonable requirements, as set out below: nFor the replacement of its Micra TI:Sa femtosecond laser, the UT states that there is no other organization in the Netherlands that can supply such lasers that are compatible

38636100Supplies
1Ex ante Ti-sa Laser

02Exclusion grounds

Exclusion grounds — consult the ESPD
  • No specific exclusion grounds were extracted. In a European tender, the mandatory and discretionary grounds of art. 2.86/2.87 of the Dutch Procurement Act almost always apply — check the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

03Value in context

Estimate not published

The contracting authority did not publish an estimated value — common for a large share of contracts. The EU threshold for leveringen is € 221.000, for reference.

04Likely competitors

#Likely bidderFitWins
1Carl Zeiss B.V.SME6810×
2Bruker Nederland B.V.SME6813×
3Bluefors OyUnknown6311×
4Leica Microsystems B.V.SME63
5Laser 2000 Benelux C.V.Unknown62
6FEI Europe B.V.SME60

05Legal themes that may be relevant here

06Frequently asked questions

What is the reason for the specific choice for this delivery?
The contract concerns the replacement of a Micra TI:Sa femtosecond laser. A specific supplier was chosen because there is no other organization in the Netherlands that can deliver a laser compatible with the existing Coherent amplifier.
On what technical grounds was the contract awarded?
The contract is awarded directly due to the absence of competition for technical reasons. There is no reasonable alternative or substitute available that can meet the requirements for compatibility with the current Coherent amplifier.

Automatically compiled from the official tender data and documents.

07Estimated value versus the market

p25
€ 300K
median
€ 515K
p75
€ 1,7 mln
deze opdracht

Gegunde waarden in CPV 38 · leveringen n=331